Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2023 TV Antennas & Equipment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Crazy Monkey
    replied
    Can you elaborate more on what you're using for the FM filters and tell me exactly what stations are causing overload? How far are these stations from your receive antenna? You seem to be doing rather well with DTV Es while I struggle.

    I'm particularly curious because my situation sounds similar. I have broadcast stations of 12 kW and 16 kW with transmit towers 1.5 and 2.0 miles from my receive location, and trying to get a clean low-VHF band seems to be impossible (particularly on channel 6 due to local 88.1).

    Leave a comment:


  • WHJ
    replied
    It has still been a slow start to the Es season this year. And most of the tropo openings have not been far enough west and/or north to help my location. I changed my 2023 equipment diagram at the top to show what is currently being used rather than my planned changes. I need my fourth HDHomeRun tuner added to TV BandScan before I can go much further. My three active tuners scan channels 2 - 36 rather than the default 2 - 51. My fourth tuner just scans channels 2 - 6.

    Leave a comment:


  • WHJ
    replied
    I figured out why KMCI has jumped to the easiest Kansas City station to detect. They have changed their ATSC 3.0 core layer from the same 256QAM 9/15 as their programing has to QPSK 4/15. Below shows the difference between their original signal in late 2021 to their current one.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	KMCI-ATSC3KC2021.png Views:	0 Size:	68.6 KB ID:	544Click image for larger version  Name:	KMCI-ATSC3KC2023.png Views:	0 Size:	71.0 KB ID:	546
    That makes their signal 21.5 dB easier to detect. The video will still take a stronger signal to view, but it should speed recapture of a weak signal.

    When reception is marginal, it is more commonly received as follows.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	KMCI-2023-Weak.png Views:	0 Size:	17.0 KB ID:	547
    The basic PLP0 information is received due it only requiring a -0.3 dB SNR. Since the enhanced PLP1 QAM256 programming requires a 21.2 SNR, the video cannot be viewed. The Flex 4K Development dBm strength and dB SNR data makes easier to see the point of reception. The first two receptions were made on a Flex 4K without the Development enhancement.

    An example of KMCI reception in the middle of the afternoon without any significant opening is shown below.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	KMCI Reception.png
Views:	514
Size:	214.9 KB
ID:	548

    The above was from https://rabbitears.info/tvdx/all_tuners
    Last edited by WHJ; 05-07-2023, 03:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • WHJ
    replied
    Until my TV Band Scan tuner names have been changed and my new tuner is added, I think that I have found a better way of connecting my antennas. Two of my three tuners shown on TV Band Scan will just have one VHF/UHF antenna connected (Winegard HD7698P's) along with either my 9-element channels 2 & 3 Yagi or my new 7-element Channels 4 & 5 Yagi. The two Winegard antennas are at different heights on different towers controlled by different rotators. Additional details are shown below.

    The third 4K tuner will have a new custom circuit to automatically cycle between up to six different UHF antennas, or a Stellar 30-2476 VHF antenna or my custom 10-element channel 6 antenna. The UHF antennas will be changed every two minutes. For now, just 4 antennas will be connected, concentrating on the first two.

    A chart of my interim connections is shown below. The no longer appropriate TV Band Scan names for my Garland, NE receptions are shown in red.

    With some TV band combiners having around just 30 dB of isolation, I often have filters added to prevent the directivity of a band's antenna from being compromised by other connected antennas.

    I am not sure why the reception of the Kansas City stations has changed this year. Originally KCTV-24 was the first KC station received. Local KSNB moving to channel ended that. Then, KPXE-30, WDAF-34 and KSHB-36 were all pretty close in being the first KC stations received. KMCI-25 and KSMO-32 were a little bit behind those three. Both of those two stations going to ATSC 3.0 did not seem to change things much. For about the last three months however, KMCI has been the clear winner as the first KC station being received.​
    Last edited by WHJ; 05-05-2023, 07:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • WHJ
    replied
    Today I got my second HD HomeRun tuner converted as close as possible to my new connections shown on the chart. I will need to have my fourth tuner added to BandScan and complete my construction of the Agilent 8765F RF switch control circuit to go further. This circuit will allow the continual connection of a selected antenna or have either of the two antennas alternated every two minutes. The second tuner receptions can be viewed at https://rabbitears.info/tvdx/one_tun...0A0E179/tuner0 I need to get revised names for those tuners.

    I better tested my new channel 4 and 5 antenna today. The receive strength of semi-local KNHL (channel 5) 74 miles away was 100% / -44 dBm when beaming towards it. With the antenna pointed in its normal SSE heading the station could not be received at all. The difference is shown below.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	KHNL CH4-5 Yagi.png Views:	0 Size:	11.3 KB ID:	510
    So, if KNHL or other local stations are not shown as being received, it probably is because the best antenna is not pointed towards it.
    Last edited by WHJ; 04-28-2023, 07:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • WHJ
    started a topic 2023 TV Antennas & Equipment

    2023 TV Antennas & Equipment

    ​​I have added some new TV antennas and associated equipment. All of the new antennas have been mounted but some custom antenna selection equipment needs to have its construction completed. The equipment is summarized below:
    ​​
    The combination of filters and selective combiners is used to prevent mixing of unwanted local signals from off-frequency antennas hurting reception of DX from the more directive antenna. The selectivity of the HD HomeRun tuner seems to be worst of the low VHF channels. The filters there help prevent overload and IMD from FM stations hurting low VHF reception. The installation to the 10A3F120 tuner has been completed. Its reception can be observed at https://rabbitears.info/tvdx/one_tun...0A3F120/tuner0

    I will include some pictures of my new antennas. I have long had a 9-element custom antenna for channels 2 and 3 and a 10-element custom antenna for channel 6 and the lower FM frequencies but nothing specifically for channels 4 and 5. Using some surplus tubing that I have a 7-element antennas channel 4 and 5 was recently installed.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	SW TV Ant 3.jpg Views:	10 Size:	44.8 KB ID:	501
    The top antenna is a Winegard HD7698P with the new channel 4 & 5 antenna just below that. A fixed direction Stellar 30-2440 is side mounted on the tower.

    I redesigned the Televes 149783 UHF antenna. Twelve elements were added, and the length of all directors was extended.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	DE CH6 & UHF Ant.jpg Views:	10 Size:	32.2 KB ID:	502
    My 10-element channel 6 antenna is on top.

    I thought that I would try something different and install my first vertically polarized TV antenna. It is just a side-mounted vertical dipole tuned best for channels 2 and 3. It is spaced from the tower to produce the following pattern:

    ​​ Click image for larger version  Name:	Vert Dipole Pattern.png Views:	10 Size:	9.5 KB ID:	503
    It is shown below with my 9-element channel 2 & 3 antenna just above it.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	NE Low VHF Ant.jpg Views:	10 Size:	26.3 KB ID:	504

    There has not been much tropo or Es opening recently (or expected in the next week) hurting evaluation of the new antennas.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by WHJ; 06-17-2023, 02:25 PM.
Working...
X
Statcounter code for vbulletin 3.8